
Allegations
What To Do in Case of An Allegation
It's the thing of nightmares. You received a letter from LARA informing you that one of your clients has filed a formal allegation against you. What the heck do you do?
​
Well, this video is a short synopsis of the steps you should take.
​
Bottom line? You have practice liability insurance for a reason. Your insurance company deals with this sort of thing, like, all the bloody time, so they are your go-to contact.
​
Below is a video that Laura was kind enough to make for us on this subject.
​
One of the most important things to keep in mind is that these types of allegations are super common, and if you have shown up in Love and Service and held fast to your ethical training, you will typically have nothing to worry about. This is just the type of thing that we risk when we work with people who are not always the most stable.

The following list was compiled by ChatGPT regarding this topic:
​Social workers in Michigan, like those in other states, may face a variety of allegations related to professional conduct, ethics, and legal compliance. These allegations can range from minor infractions to serious misconduct. Below is a list of the top 20 types of allegations commonly faced by social workers in Michigan, followed by examples of allegations that may not result in investigation or disciplinary action.​
​
Top 20 Common Allegations Against Social Workers in Michigan:
-
Boundary Violations (Non-Sexual)
Engaging in dual relationships, over-involvement with clients, or inappropriate self-disclosure. -
Sexual Misconduct
Any form of sexual contact or relationship with clients which is, of course, strictly prohibited. -
Fraudulent Billing or Insurance Fraud
Submitting false claims for services not rendered or misrepresenting services provided. -
Falsification of Records
Altering or fabricating client records or documentation. -
Improper Termination of Services
Ending client services without appropriate notice or referral. -
Substance Abuse
Practicing while impaired due to alcohol or drug use. -
Practicing Beyond Scope of License
Performing duties not authorized by one's specific licensure level. -
Unprofessional Conduct
Behaviors that violate professional standards, including disrespectful communication or failure to maintain appropriate boundaries. -
Negligence or Incompetence
Failure to provide standard care, leading to client harm. -
Confidentiality Breaches
Disclosing client information without proper authorization. -
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent
Not adequately informing clients about services or obtaining their consent. -
Conflict of Interest
Situations where personal interests interfere with professional responsibilities. -
Lapsed or Invalid License
Practicing without a current and valid license. -
Failure to Maintain Competence
Not engaging in required continuing education or staying updated with current practices. -
Failure to Report Abuse or Neglect
Not fulfilling mandatory reporting obligations. -
Improper Supervision
Failing to adequately supervise subordinate staff or interns. -
Misrepresentation of Credentials
Claiming unearned degrees, certifications, or specialties. -
Criminal Convictions
Being convicted of crimes that may impact professional standing. -
Moral Turpitude or Gross Immorality
Engaging in conduct considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty, or good morals. -
Permitting Unlicensed Practice
Allowing individuals without proper licensure to perform social work duties.
Allegations That May Not Result in Investigation or Discipline:
Not all allegations lead to formal investigations or disciplinary actions. Some examples include:
-
Minor Documentation Errors: Occasional clerical mistakes without intent to deceive.​
-
Communication Style Complaints: Differences in communication that do not violate ethical standards. ​
-
Unsubstantiated Claims: Allegations lacking credible evidence or stemming from misunderstandings.​
-
Boundary Concerns Without Harm: Situations where boundaries were questioned but no client harm occurred.​
​
Each complaint is assessed individually, and the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) determines the appropriate course of action based on the specifics of the case.